SQM Replication Project Update 04-05-06.

Hi Everyone, Dale is a member of the hyiq effort to replicate the SQM and has posted in the forums an amazing effort of putting together all the scientific references and more information of the internal working of the Atom with diagrams of the way it all works. Dale you have done a brilliant job here mate. Excellent Job Dale, Thank you.

Part 1

Hello everybody,

Yep, when you think about it, a 'modification' is anything that's not factory. They were making a movie and of course would naturally want it to sound as complicated as possible, more scientific.

Ok, initially this looks like a repeat of the same stuff. However, there are other effects that result from different perspectives. These will be added in as it goes along. I find that the naming conventions that were applied so many years ago to the electron and the photon automatically restrict our thinking processes.

I hope to be able to conceptualize two types of SQM to everyone by the time I'm done. Yeah..... two differently constructed units that do the same thing using the same principals.

: Synergy....the whole is greater than the sum of the parts...

(remember..., an electron inside an atom is the same electron(s) powering your computer. We already use the 'stuff ' of atoms all the time in common everyday items.)

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com is the source for orange colored text.
Anything from Bearden will be red and Floyd will be green.


In physics, an electric field or E-field is an effect produced by an electric charge that exerts a force on charged objects in its vicinity.
~ It doesn't matter what the object is as long as it's got a charge and they're close enough. (I haven't found anything contrary to that) So the E-field is an effect... the result of an electric charge's force on an object that has a charge of it's own.~
Electric fields are composed of photons and contain electrical energy with energy density proportional to the square of the field intensity.
~Therefore, electric fields are are composed of electromagnetic radiation since that's what photons are. Note that this is a dynamic case statement. Also note that photons are in motion at the speed of light by definition and therefore the electric and magnetic fields are coupled by default, as long as there is motion.~
In the static case, an electric field is composed of virtual photons being exchanged by the charged particle(s) creating the field.
~No motion of electric charge = no magnetic field and only virtual photons. This is all happening inside the 'orbits' of the electrons. This is the very essence of the doorway to the vacuum and it's energy.~
In the dynamic case the electric field is accompanied by a magnetic field, by a flow of energy, and by real photons.
~All of that from an electric charge that's moving AND exerting a force on another charged object. Seems too simple doesn't it? We have to remember that absolutely everything is in contact with the Virtual Vacuum, from the grand scale of the Universe down to sub subatomic particles. Sometimes it's easier to visualize it as a fluid. We are immersed in the Virtual Vacuum. Motion disturbes this fluid. A certain kind of motion creates a certain kind of .... eddy current, so to speak.~

In the description of the interaction between elementary particles in quantum field theory, a virtual particle is a temporary elementary particle, used to describe an intermediate stage in the interaction.
~We're not dealing with 'static' electric charges. Our electric charges are always moving. Always interacting because the electron is always moving. The waterfall analogy.~

~For these Bearden references, http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/vanflandern.htm~
....As Nobelist Weinberg {} points out:
"… free electrons as well as electrons in atoms are always emitting and absorbing photons that affect the electron's mass and electric charge, and so the bare mass and charge are not the same as the measured electron mass and charge that are listed in tables of elementary particles. In fact, in order to account for the observed values (which of course are finite) of the mass and charge of the electron, the bare mass and charge must themselves be infinite. The total energy of the atom is thus the sum of two terms, both infinite: the bare energy that is infinite because it depends on the infinite bare mass and charge, and the energy shift calculated by Oppenheimer that is infinite because it receives contributions from virtual photons of unlimited energy."....

~A charge is not always the same value. It changes all the time. Virtual photons are being adsorbed and emitted all of the time.~
~ Bearden himself,~
.....After a year of searching some intricate things that did not work, the solution to the desired negative entropy (coherent integration of virtual state disorder into macroscopic observable state order) turned out to be surprising simple. First, the receipt of "virtual EM energy" by the source charge is primarily via its absorption of virtual photons. Mass m of the absorbing charge q is unitary, and its absorption of a virtual photon thereby constitutes the production of a differential dm of mass, yielding (m + dm). As successive virtual photons are absorbed, we have m(t) = m0 + dm1 + dm2 + ... + dmi + ... and so on. In short, the differential unitary mass of the charge is steadily and coherently increasing in its virtual state toward the observable state. This mass-energy change becomes increasingly unstable (excited), from the virtual state viewpoint, as it nears the quantum level and the observable state threshold.
When this increasing total dm reaches sufficient magnitude to constitute the energy DE of an observable photon (DEDt) via DE = c2dm, the zitterbewegung (constant fierce bombardment of the charge by virtual particles) simply triggers the abrupt decay of the excited state and release of the excitation energy. This results in the radial emission of an observable photon from the charge, at light speed outward into surrounding space.
The "virtual photon absorption and unitary differential mass integration and summation" is the long-sought coherent integration process. The zitterbewegung plays the role of forcing the abrupt decay and quantum change that produce the observable photon emission. The process repeats over and over at incredible speed, in all directions, and this finishes the complete mechanism by which the source charge continuously absorbs and coherently integrates virtual energy from its seething vacuum exchange, and re-emits the integrated energy as real, observable photons traveling outwards at light speed.
The result completes the full mechanism by which the source charge produces and continuously maintains (at light speed) its associated "static" EM fields and potentials. Also, it is a mechanism that conserves energy during the process.....
~Simple.... once a paradigm is removed from the brain.~

....The practitioners feed oscillating field energy into the particulate medium wherein the medium’s particles are self-resonant at the input energy frequency. In that case, the reaction cross section of course dramatically increases. But that is also an increase in calculated or measured output divided by calculated or measured operator input. It therefore represents a change in the thermodynamic COP of the process itself (which includes both absorption and re-emission).....
....The ordinary vector divergence of the curl is zero in a flat spacetime, but it is not necessarily zero in a curved spacetime.The self-oscillating particles of the medium do provide sufficient spacetime curvature to allow some of the normal divergence-free Heaviside component to be diverged anyway, thus furnishing an extra Poynting energy flow input (diverged) component.....
~Here the self-oscillating part is a bit mis-leading. It is caused by the oscillating field energy put into it in the previous paragraph. In any case, spacetime is distorted, or curved, by the motion of the masses and charges involved. The 'particles of the medium' being the mass. We've all seen the educational film where a net is stretched tight and a ball is rolled around on it. The mass of the ball is sufficient to curve the plane of the net. If the ball isn't being moved around, meaning the curvature is stationary, it's area remains constant per unit time. However if the ball is in motion, the area of curvature is greater per unit time. The greater the mass, the greater the curvature. In the net example, a steeper gradient is the result of more mass. Thus it follows that heavier elements make stronger magnets.~

~Floyd (N is S),~
As postulated by Einstein in his famous equation E=MC^2 , energy is a kind of matter. So even the energy of distant starlight must be accounted for in any holistic view of physical reality. The vacuum itself is literally popping with virtual particles that appear and disappear in the field during instants too brief to be measured. Virtual particles with lifetimes or dwelltimes too short for the name "particles" to be appropriate. As a result the generated fields are always in some state of flux. However, under the influence of a generated Motional Electromagnetic field parts of the normally chaotic virtual field break off from randomness and form a more coherent region. This region consists of a structured portion of the spacetime continuum which by its very nature seems to attract more virtual particles (This increase in particle density has been verified by lab experiments conducted the week of June 19, 1988). This higher concentration of particles develops a warping of the spacetime continuum where negative energy is produced in abundance. The existence of this condition via direct engineering of the virtual state allows for the safe generation of electrical energy. This condition, in essence, forms the underlying principle of operation of the Phase-Conjugated Vacuum Triode.
~ Curved spacetime that is....I see it as an extermely distorted Gravity Well shape we are all so familiar with. It's shape (geometry) attracts more virtual particles. Notice that Floyd said a Motional Electromagnetic field? Not a motional E-field. We have become overly focused on 1/2 of the total field.......~

~Floyd (N is S),~
THE MOTIONAL E-FIELD

Of all the known fields- electric, magnetic, gravitational and motional E-field- the only ones incapable of being shielded are the induced motional E-field and the gravitational field. The nature of the motionally induced electric field is quite unique; in order understand it more fully we must start by parting with a few misleading paradigms. When magnetic flux is moved perpendicularly across a conductor an electromotive force (e.m.f.) is electromagnetically induced ``within'' the conductor. ``Within'' is an artifact of the commonly used analogy comparing the flow of electric current within a wire to the flow of water within a pipe. This is a most misleading model theoretically. The true phenomenon taking place has little been thought of as involving the production of a spatially distributed electric field. We can see that the model's origins likely arose from the operation called ``flux cutting'', a most deceiving and misleading term. A better term, ``time varying flux modulation'', does not imply any separation of lines of flux. Truly, lines of flux are always in closure upon themselves and are mathematically expressed as line integrals. It is fallacious to use the term ``cutting'', which implies time varying separation which does not in fact ever occur. .....A motionally induced E-field is actually created within the space occupied by the moving magnetic flux described above. This field is present therein, whether or not a conductor is present in the space......
~The first part of this paragraph is very distracting. Floyd even says so. So the end result is the Electromagnetic field actually. A Motional Electromagnetic field. The electric and magnetic fields are NEVER separated. The bifilar coil is going to double the electric field and cancel out the magnetic field. With it's self-inductance being zero, no standard electricity can be induced as, by design, there is no magnetic field allowed.~

~Ok, here's the Paradigm. "The electron is a negative charge." Nope, that's not correct.~

The electron is a fundamental subatomic particle which carries a negative electric charge.
The electron is one of a class of subatomic particles called leptons which are believed to be fundamental particles.
Electric charge is a fundamental conserved property of some subatomic particles, which determines their electromagnetic interactions.
Electromagnetic interactions are long range attractions or repulsions between any particles or antiparticles that have charge. If the particles are attracted they stay together, because there is a continual exchange of photons.
~(Side thought--I wonder if this may be a part of the attraction/repulsion mechanism?)~

~Electric charge is a property of the electron, just as Visible is a property of a Form. ( Form1.Visible=True....) The electron is not the charge. The amount of the charge/mass is not fixed. Quite the contrary, it's always changing due to the influx of virtual photons and subsequent emission of real photons.~


In physics, a magnetic field is an entity produced by moving electric charges (electric currents) that exerts a force on other moving charges. (The quantum-mechanical spin of a particle produces magnetic fields and is acted on by them as though it were a current; this accounts for the fields produced by "permanent" ferromagnets.) A magnetic field is a vector field: it associates with every point in space a (pseudo-)vector that may vary in time. The direction of the field is the equilibrium direction of a compass needle placed in the field.
~So we have a moving electric charge (current) producing a magnetic field AND we also have Spin producing a magnetic field. Therefore, Spin is equivalent to a moving electric charge (current). Since Spin and Charge are both properties of an electron it would seem that there are two, or more, sources of magnetic field from an atom. This may be the reason for the vortex nature of the lines of flux.~

~Since the magnetic field is a vector field, it cannot exist without either a moving electric charge or non-cancelling Spins in an atom. The electric field is also a vector field and cannot exist without an electric charge exerting a force on another charged object. The electric field exists within the magnetic field. Or rather, the magnetic field is created around the electric field when the electric charge is in motion.~



Alright then. This a good place to end Part I. I have a complete train of thought, but it's too long to do all at once. I think I have a solid grip on the sub atomic picture. To convey it with a lot of details will just take some time. I'm guessing two or three more like this one.

Well, have a good day everybody. It's time to find some aspirin... Dale

Part 2

Hello everybody,

Sorry it's taking me so long to get through this. I don't have a lot of free time.
I hope to wipe out another Paradigm today. The Sinewave.


Ok then, from Part 1

~So we have a moving electric charge (current) producing a magnetic field AND we also have Spin producing a magnetic field. Therefore, Spin is equivalent to a moving electric charge (current). Since Spin and Charge are both properties of an electron it would seem that there are two, or more, sources of magnetic field from an atom. This may be the reason for the vortex nature of the lines of flux.~

~Since the magnetic field is a vector field, it cannot exist without either a moving electric charge or non-cancelling Spins in an atom. The electric field is also a vector field and cannot exist without an electric charge exerting a force on another charged object. The electric field exists within the magnetic field. Or rather, the magnetic field is created around the electric field when the electric charge is in motion.~

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com is the source for orange colored text.
Anything from Bearden will be red and Floyd will be green.

Part 2>

~Lets go back to being 'immersed' in the virtual vacuum.~

/electromagnetic+field
If electric fluid starts to accelerate in a certain direction, it will cause a vortex of magnetic fluid to move in circles around the direction in which the electric fluid is accelerating (according to the right hand rule). As soon as the electric fluid stops accelerating, the vortex of magnetic fluid vanishes.
~No motion of charge (no current) = no magnetic field, from that source at least. The magnetic field is always the result of a moving charge (current). Or the result of Spin which is equivalent to current.~

Notice that electric fluid will not accelerate spontaneously; something has to force it to accelerate. This same thing then indirectly causes the magnetic vortex to be stirred up: a magnetic vortex will not arise spontaneously.

Finally, if magnetic fluid accelerates in a certain direction, it causes electric fluid to move in a vortex which circles around the direction of acceleration in the direction opposite to the right hand rule.

To summarise, an acceleration of the electric fluid causes a positive vortex of magnetic "liquid" to move around it, but an acceleration of the magnetic liquid causes a negative vortex of electric liquid to flow around it.

~So the electric 'fluid' is structured by the left hand. I think the positive and negative vortex's here refer to the direction of rotation of the 'fluids' around the direction of propagation. Right handed being positive by default. Thus the drawings below. These are 90' out of phase with each other. In the orthogonal representations you see the standard sine waves. The vortex nature is easy to see here. However this is only the local vortex around the charge carrying electrons path ('orbit'). /circular+polarization.~ (This is the best substitute drawing I could find. The electric field.)


~Below I've taken the orthogonal views from the merged fields view above and merged them to occupy the same space. If you move your eyes up and down the left image, you can see two ribbons counter-rotating. Note that each ribbon is composed of two sine waves, one from the magnetic field and one from the electric field, to make the image of the ribbon.~
(I couldn't figure how to put my drawing in here...)

~If the electron had a stable circular orbit around the nucleus, the shape of these fields would describe a torus.~


~Of course this Torus isn't really correct either. The fields established around the electron are local to the electron, (the charge on the electron that is), so it would look more like the model of an atom that Chris has in the Theory Update on 29-12-05 but without the trailing tail. Then too, there's more than one 'producing' electron in the atoms we are using in the magnets. The un-paired electrons. The whole thing ends up looking like a many stranded rope.~

~Those are the fields generated by a moving electric charge, being carried by the electron. (This charge is exerting a force on another charged object. There has to be another charged object nearby or there isn't an electric field. It's easy to forget about the 'other charged object')

The repeating theme here is the vortex nature of the fields. We've had the Sinewave stuffed in our faces for so long that we've forgotten it's not correct. From Beardens site.~

(couldn't find it again on his site...)

~Electric and magnetic fields aren't flat as a sinewave implys. The sinewave image interferes with understanding.~

~Electric and magnetic fields, it turns out, are not little 'butterflies' flitting to and fro. Then neither are photons! Seems that the fields are more like a propeller in the water. We don't see the water as much as we see the cavatation caused by the motion of the propeller. We are immersed in the virtual vacuum.

~We can't forget about the Spin creating it's magnetic field either. http://www.cheniere.org/books/part4/index.html is a very good read. Here are two of the graphic's from it,


There are a couple more that demonstrate this interaction. I was very pleased to find these graphic's. Trying to get a good visual from the math by itself is a real task.


According to Bearden, it's the spin that's hooking the electron to the virtual vacuum. As of yet I don't have a physical representation of what the Spin magnetic field looks like. I don't think it's going to have the same shape as the field from a moving charge.


~Here we go again.~
~PHOTONS ARE NOT LIGHT. THEY ARE ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION, for our purposes. I have to constantly remind myself of this.~

....Creation
Photons are produced by atoms when a bound electron moves from one orbital to another orbital with less (more negative) energy. Photons can also be emitted by an unstable nucleus when it undergoes some types of nuclear decay. Furthermore, photons are produced whenever charged particles are accelerated.

~The first underline relates directly to the second drawing from Bearden. The second underline tends to be ignored I think. The first thought is a big linear accelerator. However, acceleration is induced motion in a direction. We're not going to make the electron go any faster than it is. But we can give it some acceleration by making it's path change with the exciter coil. Motion in a direction.

What we are trying to do depends on the MOTIONAL effects of charges and fields. A standard generator is moving magnetic fields across conductors. It used to be that magnetos were the standard. They used actual magnets instead of creating a magnetic field by current flow through a coil. This is relative motion between the components and will only generate standard electricity.~

Floyd(N is S)
In the application of the presented equations it is required that one refer all flux densities
and movements to a single specified coordinate system. In particular, the velocities will all be
with respect to this system alone and not interpreted as relative velocities between conductors or
moving lines of flux. The coordinate system is arbitrarily selected and the magnitudes of
variational and motional fields depend upon the selection.
~In the SQM the magnets and the coils are stationary. We have no relative motion between them. The motion of the flux was induced by the exciter coil. Lets restate the last sentence.~
The magnitudes of variational and motional fields depend upon the selection (of) the coordinate system (which) is arbitrarily selected.
~So the geometry of the setup of the SQM is critical to it's operation. Yeah, we already know that but it's good to keep it in mind.

Not being able to stick my own drawings in here has watered it down a good bit. Such is life... Now I know which drawings I won't be able to use in the last chunk of this. I've gone and irritated myself... I'm not satisfied with this one.
Part III is where I integrate the Phase Conjugate Mirror into the pile.

Have a good day everybody. Dale

Part 3.

Hello Everybody,

This mess of info I've tried to make a pile out of has come from Nonlinear Optics, Particle Physics, Quantum Physics/Mechanics, Floyd, Bearden and much more... Sadly, all of this info is pre-existing for decades or centuries now. There is nothing new here...

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com is the source for orange colored text.
Anything from Bearden will be red and Floyd will be green.

~Ok, another paradigm to challenge. Electric and magnetic fields are different things.~

Floyd (N is S )
Conventional theory says that electric fields and magnetic fields are different things. Consider for a moment a charge with an electric field around it. If the charge is moved a magnetic field develops and the moving charge constitutes a current. If an observer were to move along with the charge, he would see no relative motion, no current, and no magnetic field. A stationary observer would see motion, current and a magnetic field. It would appear that a magnetic field is an electric field observed from a motional reference frame.

~ So the Electric field IS the Magnetic field. You're just looking at it from a different reference frame. Here's another source that says the same thing.~

/magnetic+field
Properties
Maxwell did much to unify static electricity and magnetism, producing a set of four equations relating the two fields. However, under Maxwell's formulation, there were still two distinct fields describing different phenomena. It was Albert Einstein who showed, using special relativity, that electric and magnetic fields are two aspects of the same thing (a rank-2 tensor), and that one observer may perceive a magnetic force where a moving observer perceives only an electrostatic force.

~What you see depends on your relative position, your... personal vector in spacetime relative to what you're looking at. Being immersed in the virtual vacuum, we see the effects of the motion of the charge through the vacuum, if it is in motion relative to us. With this in mind...~

Floyd (N is S )
In the application of the presented equations it is required that one refer all flux densities
and movements to a single specified coordinate system. In particular, the velocities will all be
with respect to this system alone and not interpreted as relative velocities between conductors or
moving lines of flux. The coordinate system is arbitrarily selected and the magnitudes of
variational and motional fields depend upon the selection.
~And again the shifted about last sentence.~
The magnitudes of variational and motional fields depend upon the selection (of) the coordinate system (which) is arbitrarily selected.

~We're not after the standard moving charge (current) of the electron. We're after it's spin (current) which is hooked to the virtual vacuum according to Bearden. The spin causes a small perturbation of the electrons path, thus increasing it's cross-sectional area. And too, this perturbation is an acceleration, motion in a direction. Electrons are refered to as a 'cloud' sometimes. This is because they really don't orbit the nucleus like the moon around the earth. The following link is a really nice site for 'orbital' graphics of the different electron shells. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is applied along with the Pauli exclusion principle and the result is this 'cloud' of electrons surrounding the nucleus. http://winter.group.shef.ac.uk/orbitron/ The electron can be anywhere in it's 'area' at any given time.~
~So we have the magnetic fields from all of the un-paired electrons' charges and from non-cancelling spins merging into a 'rope' of flux lines, (when they have a collective direction of orientation), from each atom. Each atom is a magnet in this situation. However the domains in a normal magnet tend to 'freeze' the atoms in a particular position. A permanent magnet.~

Floyd (N is S )
The fundamental magnets have been broken free of their binding forces which constrained them
to be steadystate single pole uniform magnetic flux devices. They are now able to simply
support mass, as demonstrated with the transformer steel illustration. They can now easily be
made to adopt a dynamic motional field by applying a tiny amount of excitation.

~I'm sure that paragraph has caused a lot of thought. Here's my gut reaction on it. An alternating current de-magnatizes a magnet, scrambles the domain structure. Then the mass was magnetized in two directions 90' from each other keeping a common alignment with the earth's magnetic field for a reference point, if I'm remembering the process correctly. A magnet can have more than one pair of poles. Hysteresis..., the magnet remembers having two poles and so can easily flop back and forth between either orientation being the dominant at that time. That constitutes a moving flux, with a little bit of tickle to flip it.~

Floyd (N is S )
The vacuum triode is a solid state device consisting of conditioned permanent magnets
capable of producing a motional field. This field opens the gate to the Dirac Sea where negative
energy is able to flow from an into the triode's receiving coils......

...However, under the influence of a generated Motional Electromagnetic field parts
of the normally chaotic virtual field break off from randomness and form a more coherent region.
This region consists of a structured portion of the spacetime continuum which by its very nature
seems to attract more virtual particles

~Spacetime is only going to curve so much, according to the energy level being applied to curve it, so there has to be a load to draw off the energy. Otherwise it becomes a 'static', (waterfall style), distortion that just sits there.~


http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Final%20Secret%209%20Feb%201993/add%20comments%2012%20Mar%2093.htm

(1) use of the inner WZ internal biwave structure of the potential as pump waves on/to a nonlinear material (such as the atomic nucleus), so that the nucleus becomes a pumped phase conjugate mirror. Then, by normal phase conjugate optical theory, simply inputting a small signal wave will produce an amplified phase conjugate replica (PCR) wave emitted from the mirror material, and this PCR will precisely backtrack the original input signal wave's path (see the distortion correction theorem) back out of the nucleus, out of the atom, and into the external circuit. There, the amplified PCR wave can be "filtered off" and sent to the external load, to power the load. The Floyd Sweet vacuum triode works precisely by this mechanism. Note particularly that Barrett has shown that higher topology EM (such as the original quaternion EM theory) can accomplish such "optical functioning" without the use of optical materials. To do Sweet's vacuum triode type process is thus theoretically possible with electrical circuitry alone, but one must have more than the current understanding of CEM, as Barrett pointed out. In other words, one can "open" any 4-space system by adding hyperspace (or subspace, if one insists on retaining Minkowski 4-space). One can thus have a hyperspatial source. Indeed, Ziolkowski and others have already pointed out that the WZ type decomposition of the scalar potential is essentially equivalent to having complex sources.
~This is Barrett's article.~ http://www.cheniere.org/references/TeslaOSC.pdf



~A1 and A2 are opposing. This creates the spacetime distortion (STRESS) in the presence of the mirror(s), thus attracting the virtual particles from the vacuum. I think A1 and A2 mimic magnets in that they are supplying magnetic fields, electrically, onto a phase conjugate material.~

~Remember, Light is electromagnetic radiation. (Yeah, it gets old) A phase conjugate wave is established instantly and backtracks the input signal precisely. All that needs be done is to have the collector coil in the proper orientation.~

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/nonlinear+optics
Optical phase conjugation

Comparison of a phase conjugate mirror with a conventional mirror. With the phase conjugate mirror the image is not deformed when passing through an aberrating element twice. It is possible, using nonlinear optical processes, to exactly reverse the propagation direction and phase variation of a beam of light. The reversed beam is called a conjugate beam, and thus the technique is known as optical phase conjugation (also called time reversal, wavefront reversal and retroreflection).



~This is the negative energy source. The Phase Conjugate wave coming back at the source wave from the mirror(s). Whether the mirror is a magnet or not, the nucleus is still involved.~

The most common way of producing optical phase conjugation is to use a four-wave mixing technique, though it is also possible to use processes such as stimulated Brillouin scattering. A device producing the phase conjugation effect is known as a phase conjugate mirror (PCM).

For the four-wave mixing technique, we can describe four beams (j = 1,2,3,4) with electric fields:......

~Further on in the article....~
.....Note that the constant of proportionality between the signal and conjugate beams can be greater than 1. This is effectively a mirror with a reflection coefficient greater than 100%, producing an amplified reflection. The power for this comes from the two pump beams, which are depleted by the process. ...... ~And amplified by the magnets yeilding more than was input.~

~This is a good one about Four Wave Mixing. Our stuff is towards the end but the basic explanations are at the beginning of course.~
http://www.physics.montana.edu/students/thiel/docs/FWMixing.pdf

~The nonlinear medium is of course the magnet. I feel that the medium being a magnet is benificial although not absolutely necessary. Being a magnet actually makes it an amplifier because of the free energy being generated/captured from the vacuum is coming from the lines of flux which are in motion and are Free. A magnet is a spacetime distortion, constantly collecting free energy from the vacuum, pouring out it's magnetic flux. Here's another thought... The difference between the Virtual Vacuum and the Observable is a kind of broken symmetry... a kind of special Dipole. When spacetime is stressed, a sort of concentrating 'lens' is formed attracting more and more virtual particles, increasing the stressed area, and attracting even more particles. This stressed area can (probably) only hold so much energy and becomes saturated (full if you will). Thus if there is no load or sink to tap the energy, it becomes a 'static' entity, in waterfall fashion. The motion of this stressed area (input signal) in the presence of the bi-filar coil allows the coil to adsorb some of this energy.~

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Time+Reversal+Signal+Processing
Time Reversal signal processing is a technique for focusing waves. A Time Reversal Mirror (TRM) is a device that can focus waves using the time reversal method. TRMs are also known as time reversal mirror arrays, as they are usually arrays of transducers, but they do not have to be arrays.

~An array of transducers, in this case, can be the atoms in the Phase Conjugate Material even though an array isn't required. The nucleus being the actual transducer. It doesn't have to be a magnet..... Barium titanate is a phase conjugate material in it's own right.~

Bearden, http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/vanflandern.htm
The ordinary vector divergence of the curl is zero in a flat spacetime, but it is not necessarily zero in a curved spacetime. The self-oscillating particles of the medium do provide sufficient spacetime curvature to allow some of the normal divergence-free Heaviside component to be diverged anyway, thus furnishing an extra Poynting energy flow input (diverged) component.....

~Off topic somewhat....~
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/magnetic+field
In SI units, B and H are measured in teslas (T) and amperes per meter (A/m), respectively; or, in cgs units, in gauss (G) and oersteds (Oe), respectively. Two parallel wires carrying an electric current in the same sense will generate a magnetic field which will cause a force of attraction to each other. This fact is used to generate the value of an ampere of electric current. Note that while like charges repel and unlike ones attract, the opposite holds for currents: if the current in one of the two parallel wires is reversed, the two will repel.

~Considering that magnetic flux has a 'direction', N to S outside the magnet, I think that looking at the flux like it's a current can help with the understanding of the attraction/repulsion mechanism. Two magnets can be as two different 'currents', thus when S is put to N the 'current' is traveling in a 'like sense'. Inward on the S and outward on the N. Just a thought, speculation.

Well, that's it for now. Simple and complicated at the same time. Our Paradigm's are our box. We need to be outside the box and I think we're getting there.

OK everybody, tear it apart. Find the mistakes so the corrections can be made. I found a few along the way so there's a good chance that I made more. I can't think of everything by myself and I'm not perfect. I look forward to seeing what you think.

Have a fresh day everybody. Dale

Well more coming soon as always.

_________________
To reach new horizons...