|
SQM Replication Project Update
15-05-05.
Hi Everyone, I have not received a
yes or no about permission yet to
put this information up but I am
going to do it any way. It is very
important and if the author would
like it taken down then the author
can let me know and I will remove it
right away. I apologise if this
causes any problems to the Author
but I must say good work and this
sounds like the closest replication
thus far of the SQM. I also have
found a good web site that shows the
E-Field in a java applet:
http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~phys1/java/phys1/EField/EField.html
The Motional E-Field.
This is one of my most interesting
projects that I have kept private.
While experimenting for several
years on this project, I decided to
release what information I have
concerning this extremely exciting
subject. The experiments I will
explain could Kill you. Use Extreme
caution. You have been warned,
proceed at your own risk.
Lots of folks have tried in vain to
build a machine that exploits the
Motional E Field. The problem is a
basic understanding of HOW it works.
Notice, I did not say why it works.
I don’t have a clue as to WHY it
works. I have read everything I
could find on the subject, it is
vague on what’s out there about it.
I will leave WHY it works to
Bearden, Sweet, Kaluza-Klien and
others who profess to know this. I
do recommend reading "Nothing is
Something" by Floyd Sweet found with
a good search program. But even then
he is trying to explain where this
mystery potential is coming from,
instead of explaining how to
actually build a device to produce
it.
A normal wound coil has induction. A
Bifilar coil connected in
reverse-Parallel {Ends Tied} has
very little. We will use both in a
device to exploit the MEF. The
experiment will be just that, not a
full time working device ready to
power your house or car. Purchase
{3} rolls of 24 gauge at 100 feet
each magnet wire. I use the GC brand
part# L3-612. Gather {2} empty
plastic spools with a 1 inch bore.
The GC brand comes on these 1 inch
bore spools, very handy. Take {2}
rolls of the 24 gauge wire and wind
them on a empty spool. We are making
a bifilar coil. Take your time and
wind it carefully keeping the wires
together as you wind. You need good
balanced bifilar coil. Make sure the
wires are the same length, 100 feet.
When you get through, clip the ends
equal and tie them together. Now
test your bifilar wire. It must NOT
conduct any electrical potential and
or current. Hold it next to a
spinning magnet assembly of sorts
with a good meter set on AC.
Nothing.... it must not conduct
anything, this is very important.
The bifilar coil will be your pick
up coil, but NOT as NORMAL
electrical conduction. Take your
last roll of wire and leave it on
the spool and we will use it as the
exciter coil. These coils have no
cores, and you will see why later.
Find or purchase {2} ferrite magnets
2" x 6" x 1" will do. We are only
doing an experiment.
You will not have a continuous
output, so go this route first. Do
not use Neo's, their lattice domains
are very tight. You will have to
demagnetize these magnets to about
10 to 20 gauss. How you do it is up
to you. One can wrap the magnets
with magnet wire and dump cap
voltage against the fields, or use
heat. This is common, so I won’t go
into that procedure here. Once the
magnets are demagnetized, we need to
treat them. We need to impress a 60
Hz field in the now loosened domains
of the magnets. Wrap the magnets
separately with 100 feet of #19 or
#20 wire each. Wire these in series
and connect them to a veriac on the
lowest level. Go do something else
for 2 or 3 hours. You can build
conditioning coils on forms that
slide over the magnets for easy
removal and installation. After 2 or
3 hours remove the coils and check
the magnets with a scope. You should
see a weak 60 hz signal on the
magnets. Carefully place the bifilar
coil and the exciter coil between
the {2} magnets. Space them as far
apart as possible without the spools
hanging off the edges of the
magnets. use plastic ties to keep
them in place.
Connect the Exciter coil to a
generator at 8 to 12 volts at 2 to 3
ma at 60hz. Place a load across the
bifilar coil, such as a light. See
if the bulb will flash. If it does,
place more bulbs in line with the
load. It may even blow the bulb.
This field is regulated by load. You
may have to experiment with the
exciter voltage to get the effect to
occur. All one wishes to do is
vibrate the magnet. do not overdrive
the magnet with the exciter voltage.
This will not last long, the magnets
will loose the 60Hz signal. Perhaps
Barium ferrite IS needed to keep the
60hz signal or the whole design is
not shielded properly or it will
always run down. Barium has high
electron emissivity and promotes
electron scattering when excited.
The point is: Something of the
electrical nature lit the bulbs from
a non-conductive coil. The bifilar
coil was not connected to anything
but the bulbs placed between the {2}
treated magnets.
Now, HOW it works. As current flows
through a wire the electrons act
like magnets when they MOVE. Now if
they don’t move, they just have a
electrical field around them. If we
move this current through the
bifilar coil, the magnetism cancels.
But moving the electron magnetism
will actually add. The magnet
domains have been loosened. Their
domains are not locked in a position
they can shuttle some what within
the structure. But they still have a
very small amount of magnetism. It
is like billions of small magnets
vibrating about the domains because
of the 60hz exciter coil. They also
have a 60hz signal that we supplied
to the magnets. Because they have a
slight charge on top of being small
magnets the E-Field will manifest
into the bifilar coil. But this is
not the normal conductive current.
In fact any normal conductive
current abounds, it will cancel the
effect. This is the reason the
bifilar coil must be made so
carefully. You MUST have the least
amount of induction in your bifilar
coil as possible. This is the reason
I use no core. I want a small
exciter signal that does not
interfere with the bifilar coil, so
the exciter coil has no core either.
All the exciter coil does is vibrate
the domains which have the 60hz
signal placed on all those billions
of atoms already that are very
slightly magnetized in the domains.
Moving a electrical charge against
another charge by separate wire
cancels the magnetism in both wires
and adds.
This is the Motional E-Field.
3-1-03
I have done some brief experiments
to try to verify this work but not
yet had any success. I am very
excited about this and will continue
in this area as well as the
conventional video data from Mr
Sweet and Mr Bearden.
I also got this Email that is very
interesting and sheds some light on
magnet conditioning:
I was looking at your
website especially the
John Bedini and Tom
Bearden inputs. Peter
Bruce Quoted Sweet as
follows regarding magnet
conditioning during a
discussion:
"Searl activated his
magnets in a fluxgate
furnace in a manner
different from Sparky's
method".
About Searl's method of
magnet conditioning here
is a description sent to
me some 15 years ago by
the late Gunnar Sandberg
who met and investigated
Searl's claims:
"The Magnetisation
method used by Searl :
The coil used by Searl
to magnetise molded
cores was originally
intended for and used to
demagnetise (degaussing)
turbine shafts and
generator shafts and
consisted of
approximately 200 turns
of heavy electric copper
wire normally used for
connecting electric
cookers to the mains.
The magnetising current
was 180 amperes and
supplied by a
westinghouse three phase
mercury rectifier. The
on-off cycle lasted
seconds rather than
fractions of a second.
Based on what can only
be described as
intuition, Searl
suggested that a second
winding be added to the
existing magnetising
DC-Coil and connected to
an AC source. This
proposition created
heated discussion
amongst his fellow
workers as to the effect
of such a magnetising
method. The general view
was that the magnetic
field created by an
alternating current
would partly cancel the
magnetic field created
by the direct current
and make the coil less
efficient. However Searl
suggested that the
existing RF
signal generator in the
laboratory should
be used as an AC source;
this would prevent
cancellation of the DC
field. This idea was met
with even greater
scepticism as the
current supplied by
the signal generator
would be minute and have
an insignificant effect
on the magnetising
process. Searl persisted
however with his views
and eventually suceeded
in winning his manager's
approval. Searle can
remember his manager
carrying out certain
calculations concerning
the design of the AC
winding which were
beyond Searl's
comprehension at the
time, however based on
fundamental electrical
engineering, it can be
assumed that the
calculation involved
resonance and
characteristic impedance
determinations in order
to avoid shorting out
the signal generator".
This suggests that the
Sweet's idea came from
hearing about Searl.
Also Searl used bonded
cores rather than
sintered material. Seale
magnetised roller had
tracks of n-s-n poles
all the way round.
Going back to Sweet He
also says "Magnets
are spaced 2" apart in
traction mode The
excitation coil is
inside the and is
bifilar and wound to
cause space stress in
the magnets. The
exciatation is very weak
but apparently moves the
traction flux. The
kernal flux of the
conditioned magnet is
cancelled out at least
1" from the pole faces,
the central airgap flux
is made to appear and
dissappear in step with
the space stress caused
by the excitation coil."
The bifilar coil idea
seems to originate from
Hooper's motional-field
experiments.
Thanks Mike for the excellent Info.
|
