Hi Everyone, This update is a theory
update. In the update on 08-10-05, I
stated, "what exactly is the
Motional E-Field". I now know
exactly what it is. Here is a small
bit of information about the Atom
and Electrons in a brief summary.
The Atom.
All
macroscopic matter is
made out of many tiny
particles called atoms.
The study of how these
atoms interact is called
Chemistry.
Subatomic Particles.
The three
particles that make up
atoms are protons,
neutrons, and
electrons. Protons and
neutrons are heavier
than electrons and
reside in the "nucleus,"
which is the centre of
the atom. Protons have a
positive electrical
charge, and neutrons
have no electrical
charge. Electrons are
extremely lightweight
and are negatively
charged. They exist in
a cloud that surrounds
the atom. The electron
cloud has a radius
10,000 times greater
than the nucleus.
The Nucleus.
The
nucleus of an atom is
made up of protons and
neutrons in a cluster.
Virtually all the mass
of the atom resides in
the nucleus. The
nucleus is held together
by the tight pull of
what is known to
chemists and physicists
as the "strong force."
This force between the
protons and neutrons
overcomes the repulsive
electrical force that
would, according to the
rules of electricity,
push the protons apart
otherwise.
Electrons.
The
electron is the
lightweight particle
that "orbits" outside of
the atomic nucleus.
Chemical bonding is
essentially the
interaction of electrons
from one atom with the
electrons of another
atom. The magnitude of
the charge on an
electron is equal to the
charge on a proton.
Electrons surround the
atom in pathways called
orbitals. The inner
orbital's surrounding
the atom are spherical
but the outer orbitals
are much more
complicated.
Randomly Spinning Electrons Around
an Atom.
I originally thought the "Motional
E-Field" was "The Motional Electro
Magnetic Field" but it is not. Here
is what the Motional E-Field is.
At
the point of magnetisation
saturisation in a magnet all the
electron orbitals
are changed to a level state at 90
Degrees to the Nucleus and all
Electrons should be rotating in the
same direction, I guess it would be
clockwise to the nucleus of the
Atom. The force in the Atom's
Nucleus is in a relatively steady
state except for the electrons
spinning around the Nucleus. This is
creating a vortex type of motion in
the one direction. It is this
Electron Vortex in motion, all in a
single direction that is creating
the magnetic field. The Nucleus is
the magnetic field core. The
combination of the Electron Vortex
motion and the Nucleus gives you a
magnetic field but the positively
charged Proton would dominate the
magnetic field. All the atoms would
look like this all in the same
direction:
There are millions if not billions
of Atoms in a magnet. Other effects
are there but not visible due to the
relatively steady state of the
atomic nucleus and single vortex
motion of the "Electron Field". Now
when the Magnets are successfully
conditioned the "Electron Field" is
moving not just in a vortex motion
but the axis of the vortex is also
changing. This gives you a magnetic
field oscillation but also gives you
a "Electron Field" Oscillation. An
"Electron Field" Oscillation is the
"Motional E-Field" where the
negatively charged Electron would
dominate. It is the outer
complex orbitals of
the "Electron Field" that is being
collected by the SQM's Collector
Coils. If one is to read Prof. Dr.
Ing. Konstantin Meyl's book Scalar
Waves (first Tesla physics textbook
for engineers) this theory makes
perfect sense. The book states
briefly that the Atom has a force
(Neutrinos from the surrounding
Space) that are used by the atom to
keep the electrons from collapsing
in on the Protons and Neutrons. If
you like the Atom is feeding on this
outside energy. Also a quote from Mr
Sweets Paper "Nothing Is Something"
is
"A motionally induced E-field is
actually created within the space
occupied by the moving magnetic flux
described above."
Note: It is said "created
within the space occupied by
the moving magnetic flux
" so it is not the magnetic moving
flux that creates this "Motional
E-Field",
and also
"It seems that the charged particles
in the atom (electrons and protons)
act like tiny magnets. Their motion
in the space surrounding the atom
would create this motional
E-field''. The field created by both
the positive and negative charges
would cancel to some degree, but due
to the high orbital velocity of the
negative electron relative to that
of the positive proton the induced
field of the electron should
dominate the resulting field. The
field produced as a result of these
charges would vary proportionally to
the inverse square of distance
similar to gravity."
The Negative Electricity produced by
the SQM makes perfect sense now.
The magnitude of the charge on an
electron is equal to the charge on a
proton but if the amount of
Electrons are greater than the
number of Protons a negative charge
would dominate.
Another important piece of
information is Mr Searl said and has
said for many years that he uses
Neodymium magnets because of the
high Electron count in the Atoms.
Neodymium is part of the Lanthanide
series, Rare Earth element Family.
This Family has more Electrons
generally per particle. Barium
Ferrite does also have a high number
of Electrons generally but it is not
part of this Family. This could mean
other materials may be better than
Barium Ferrite but Barium Ferrite is
a good start at least.
When comparing the way the SQM Works
and Mr Tom Beardens source charge
problem there are remarkable
similarities and this in fact opens
the door to new electrical
challenges and new technologies
never before possible:
June 2000:
The source charge
problem—“the most
difficult problem in
classical and quantum
electrodynamics”*—solved
by Tom Bearden.
This information says to me that the
SQM is a perfect "Zero Point Energy
" Collection Device and is well
worth the effort in the replication.
