HI Everyone,

A Magnets Magnetic flux is measured in several terms. Tesla, Maxwell's or Lines of Flux Sq Inch, Webbers, and most commonly used is Gauss. Grade 5 or Grade 8 Ferrite magnets are in the order of 3900 - 4200 Gauss per Square Centimetre. This is interesting, if one does the calculations, I get the same as Floyd. 2 Turns per volt using Floyds criteria.

Focusing on just the Equation and not the diagram here in the above picture we find a very real solid bit of information. A coil of wire is very efficient if a few things are done. The great Nikola Tesla pointed out these things. Coil Capacity needs to be minimised and heat loss is helped by minimising Lenz Law. Thin Soft Iron Transformer Laminations help keep Lenz's Law low. Small loss in the second coil when separating the Magnetic flux there is a very low loss. This would be very close to 0.11. This is a real verified bit of data. Click Here

Coming back to the magnets flux density (Working in Inches), one magnet can be calculated, 4200 (Gauss per Centimetre) x 6.45 to get Lines per Inch, then multiply by 2 (Remembering we have two magnets). This gives us 54180 Lines of Flux per square Inch. Area is important. Look into Transformer Formers or Spools and how they are calculated and wound. The Leaves, Soft Iron insulated leaves stacked in the core that are 90 percent + efficient. Click Here for more info. Now looking at the next picture we can see more verification of the Power Coil configuration.

Fig. 2 is the same circuit as Floyds VTA/SQM apart from the Bifilar integration. So the above is a huge improvement. There is a seesaw action of Flux in the operation of the VTA /SQM and Daniel McFarland Cooks Electro-Magnetic Battery. Lester Hendershot's Generator is the same in its functionality of generation. To make this work one must use and understand the equations however. Coils turns per unit area is critical. History has documented that sometimes this configuration can be hard to start also. Floyd Sweet has greatly simplified this with his Bifilar coils. At any one time, one coil is generating enough current (Magnetic Flux Collapsing back into Attraction mode) to move the flux up (Separating the Magnetic Flux) on the other second coil. I can verify this statement by the "Nothing Is Something" Paper by Floyd Sweet.

The most important statement in the "Nothing is Something" Paper:

"Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils located
within the fields of the two conditioned magnets. When the current in one half of the conductors
in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the
current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule. The resultant motional E-field would
be vertical to both and inwardly directed. At the same time the current in the other half of the
conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-
hand rule. The resulting motion E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed. Thus,
the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil
conductors taken singularly."

Notice the word "Coils" is plural and not singular. Meaning two Power coils like in the above schematic. Read the above again and remove the word "conditioned" and look at the schematic again and this will make perfect sense.

"Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils located
within the fields of the two magnets. When the current in one half of the conductors
in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the
current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule. The resultant motional E-field would
be vertical to both and inwardly directed. At the same time the current in the other half of the
conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-
hand rule. The resulting motion E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed. Thus,
the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil
conductors taken singularly."

Below you can see the two Magnets in attraction mode. The VTA/SQM in an off state would have field lines like in the below picture:

The two power coils are visible between the magnets. After starting the VTA/SQM then one action would look like this:

The second action would look like this:

and then the whole action would start again thus producing a Sine Wave output.

Daniel McFarland Cook also describes this action, Click Here to download his Patent. If one follows the right hand rule, like in the above extract from the Nothing is Something Paper, then a coil will produce a North pole in the direction of the fingers. Two North Poles will repel and two south poles will repel each other. Magnets have the highest field strength close to the side of the magnets or away from the centre and not in the middle as one would think. The great Howard Johnston has shown us this. Magnetic flux on the magnets surface MUST be even, meaning no defects may be present or you are wasting your time. It is funny, one power bill is probably more than the cost to build the SQM/VTA, isn't this crazy.

So far I have shown there is enough data to show we have a very real Scientific Method to support power production easily and simply without breaking the rules of Science like some have said. Very real Science and a very real solution to much of our problems. We have been given ALL the data to show us all how to do it. It just needed to be put together.

Well more coming soon as always.

_____________________
To reach new horizons...