Become a member of our Forum, and gain access to a lot more information!



Hi Everyone,

Today I am going to explain where my research is leading me. First of all, if the picture of everything is taken, all the facts, speculations and outright wrong information, we can see patterns. Patterns that tend to show mostly the same things but sometimes they can be misleading also.

Floyd Sweet was without a doubt a genius. But his technology may not have been his. It may have been an adaptation of other technologies as I will show below.

First I want to start with some quotes from the latest information we have been given:





Space-Quanta Modulator - Clean-Propulsion Power Now! -

The Space-Quanta Modulated Mark 1 Static Alternator

Laboratory experiments dealing with magnetic fields support the concept that magnetic flux may be modulated by low level oscillatory means. However there is no lateral movement of flux. Rather, what happens is that the individual packets of quanta are polarized by the initiating and sustaining coherent force the field of the primary magnets or in special cases, electromagnets.

As the low level oscillatory frequency (modulating frequency) from the oscillators pass through zero reversing polarity during . The quanta, being polarized, flip in synchronism with the modulating frequency, presenting a change in flux polarity varying with time determined by the period of the oscillator frequency. Stationary field and stationary stator coils are featured in the machine. Except for a possible low level 60 Hz hum, the alternator is noise-less. There are no bearings or moving parts.


Space-Quanta Modulator - Clean-Propulsion Power Now! - The Space Quanta Modulator: How it Works


Very low power is needed to modulate the quanta, which is in a coherent state under the influence of the residual effects of energy initially consumed in the so-called magnetization process. This energy is steady state and is actually orientated space quanta, which is not a property of the magnet, but initiated by the initial magnetizing force.

Space-Quanta Modulator - Clean-Propulsion Power Now! and Letter to Mark

The number of turns per coil is determined by Faraday's law as quantized by Neumann. Stranded wire is used for ease of winding. This wire is specially insulated, and over this insulation is wound a current feedback winding spirally traversing the total length of the coil conductor. Also a voltage winding of considerably smaller wire and more turns is also wound axially, traversing the total length of the coil conductor. The respective leads are brought out to terminals, and to these terminals is connected the output of the current and voltage sensing transformers. We now have, when the current and voltage windings are excited, another set of fields virtually in quadrature with the fields (alternating) initiated by the load current flowing in the power phase coils. The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitude.


Space-Quanta Modulator - Clean-Propulsion Power Now! - The Space Quanta Modulator: How it Works


The architectural configuration of the windings and their relationship to the magnets will be best understood by observing the construction of a prototype. The defining equations are similar to those of the dynamic Space Flux Coupled alternator. A working prototype should be ready about Easter.

Lab Notes - Floyd Sweet 0005

Explanation is unknown but Sparky believes that "Static Flux Quanta", which are normally in a disordered state, come into coherence in proximity to a magnet, and feels that the magnetic field is a result of interaction of the relativistic quantum effects of the magnetic materials atomic structure in unpaired parallel electron Spin states, net domain orientation, spin-orbital coup-linings, etc...


Lab Notes - Floyd Sweet 0004

It seems to be affected by the quality of the sine wave, negatively by harmonic distortion, such as that of the Moon Valley oscillator (Circuit on P8 26 - 7)


Lab Notes - Floyd Sweet 0008

Out in space - unintegrated - Space-Flux Quanta in proximity of Mag they become Integrated :. Field is not a prop of magnet which has vector quantities (lines of force) which directs quanta (analogy : water guided by a pipe) 10^100 energy of matrix


It does not take a rocket scientist to see that the Magnets in the Space Quanta Modulator had a purpose. To see the fact that Floyd did not alter the Magnetic Field in so far as to "Damage" the field, is also not hard. Quotes like: "Stationary field and stationary stator coils are featured in the machine" and "Rather, what happens is that the individual packets of quanta are polarized by the initiating and sustaining coherent force the field of the primary magnets or in special cases, electromagnets." Please remember these are Floyds words. Lots of other quotes could be taken but I have just used what I believe to be the best.

Its important to take the whole picture into account. Floyd is talking about "Quanta" and "Modulating" it as such. "Quanta" can mean anything at all. It could be the Magnetic Field out in Space, or it could be the "Quanta" in the Copper Power Coils themselves! If a Load was to be Powered by "Negative Energy" the Load would need to be directly Connected to the actual source of this Negative Electricity! Soon you will see why this is so important to understand! Why would "Modulating" "Quanta" in the Copper Power Coils be a likely candidate for the Operation of the Space Quanta Modulator? Lets have a look at the properties of Copper. Ref:

General properties
Name, symbol, number copper, Cu, 29
Pronunciation /ˈkɒpər/ KOP-ər
Element category transition metal
Group, period, block 11, 4, d
Standard atomic weight 63.546(3)
Electron configuration [Ar] 3d10 4s1
2, 8, 18, 1
Electron shells of copper (2, 8, 18, 1)
Discovery Middle Easterns (9000 BC)
Physical properties
Phase solid
Density (near r.t.) 8.96 g·cm−3
Liquid density at m.p. 8.02 g·cm−3
Melting point 1357.77 K, 1084.62 °C, 1984.32 °F
Boiling point 2835 K, 2562 °C, 4643 °F
Heat of fusion 13.26 kJ·mol−1
Heat of vaporization 300.4 kJ·mol−1
Molar heat capacity 24.440 J·mol−1·K−1
Vapor pressure
P (Pa) 1 10 100 1 k 10 k 100 k
at T (K) 1509 1661 1850 2089 2404 2834
Atomic properties
Oxidation states +1, +2, +3, +4
(mildly basic oxide)
Electronegativity 1.90 (Pauling scale)
Ionization energies
1st: 745.5 kJ·mol−1
2nd: 1957.9 kJ·mol−1
3rd: 3555 kJ·mol−1
Atomic radius 128 pm
Covalent radius 132±4 pm
Van der Waals radius 140 pm
Crystal structure face-centered cubic
Copper has a face-centered cubic crystal structure
Magnetic ordering diamagnetic[1] (I believe this bit to be wrong!)
Electrical resistivity (20 °C) 16.78 nΩ·m
Thermal conductivity 401 W·m−1·K−1
Thermal expansion (25 °C) 16.5 µm·m−1·K−1
Speed of sound (thin rod) (r.t.) (annealed)
3810 m·s−1
Young's modulus 110–128 GPa
Shear modulus 48 GPa
Bulk modulus 140 GPa
Poisson ratio 0.34
Mohs hardness 3.0
Vickers hardness 369 MPa
Brinell hardness 874 MPa
CAS registry number 7440-50-8

Because of Coppers Electron Configuration, it is a Paramagnetic Material. I reference Wikipedia:

"Paramagnetism is a form of magnetism whereby certain materials are attracted by an externally applied magnetic field. In contrast with this behaviour, diamagnetic materials are repelled by magnetic fields. Paramagnetic materials include most chemical elements and some compounds; they have a relative magnetic permeability greater or equal to unity (i.e., a positive magnetic susceptibility) and hence are attracted to magnetic fields. The magnetic moment induced by the applied field is linear in the field strength and rather weak. It typically requires a sensitive analytical balance to detect the effect and modern measurements on paramagnetic materials are often conducted with a SQUID magnetometer.

Paramagnetic materials have a small, positive susceptibility to magnetic fields. These materials are slightly attracted by a magnetic field and the material does not retain the magnetic properties when the external field is removed. Paramagnetic properties are due to the presence of some unpaired electrons, and from the realignment of the electron paths caused by the external magnetic field. Paramagnetic materials include magnesium, molybdenum, lithium, and tantalum.

Unlike ferromagnets, paramagnets do not retain any magnetization in the absence of an externally applied magnetic field because thermal motion randomizes the spin orientations. Some paramagnetic materials retain spin disorder at absolute zero, meaning they are paramagnetic in the ground state. Thus the total magnetization drops to zero when the applied field is removed. Even in the presence of the field there is only a small induced magnetization because only a small fraction of the spins will be oriented by the field. This fraction is proportional to the field strength and this explains the linear dependency. The attraction experienced by ferromagnetic materials is non-linear and much stronger, so that it is easily observed, for instance, by the attraction between a refrigerator magnet and the iron of the refrigerator itself."

This means that Copper and other materials can exhibit a Paramagnetic Effect in the proximity to "the field of the primary magnets or in special cases, electromagnets." So see where I am going with this? Now, you will say: "Hang on a minute here, this means nothing". Well, actually that could not be further from the truth. The quote: "a voltage winding of considerably smaller wire and more turns is also wound axially, traversing the total length of the coil conductor." is an important point of interest. I will show here why.


First some history on this idea or topic:

"In the Ural Mountains in 1992, a Russian geologist accidentally discovered what would later be known as Russian nano spirals. The discovery of the Russian nano spirals, or more correctly miniscule spiral-shaped objects, was made while investigating mineral deposits. The artefacts were made from copper, tungsten, and molybdenum. The objects ranged in size from the largest that was about 1 1/18 inches to the smallest which was only 1/10,000th of an inch. These curious findings bore an eerie resemblance to the control elements used in recently developed “nano-machines”all of the pieces were found at depths between 10 and 40 feet, embedded in gravel and detritus deposits. These deposits corresponded to the lower region of the Mikulinsk Horizon of the upper Pleistocene Era, suggesting that the objects themselves may be around 100,000 years old. There is no possible way such objects could be embedded so deeply without having ancient origins.

All of the objects appear to be manufactured as no type of natural process known could explain their creation. How humans 100,000 years ago would have been able to be technologically advanced to such a degree as to be able to create them is unknown. Is this mysterious discovery evidence that humans may have been more technologically advanced than previously believed or are the objects evidence of extraterrestrial contact or presence?"

Referenced from:


And now a little more recent:

An Article Published; "Science et Vie" nr.700 March 1976 ( pages 42-45 ), by Renaud de la Taille, and also French Patent # 2,385,255, French Patent # 2,680,613 and Czechoslovakia Patent # 284,333.

The article published in "Science et Vie" nr.700 March 1976 ( pages 42-45 ) is entitled: "A POWER PLANT AT HOME".

Click Here for the English Translation.

(Please note: This document is in early stages of the Translation and may change.)

Here you can see the similarities to Floyd Sweets first Generation 1 Space Quanta Modulator!

Un-cannily, the quote: "a voltage winding of considerably smaller wire and more turns is also wound axially, traversing the total length of the coil conductor." is exactly one of the next experiments of Richard VIALLE as you will see in the videos.

Is there anywhere else we can see more evidence that this technology is real and exists? - YES, I have left the best till last. Richard VIALLE's work has been measured to be in excess of COP > 100,000.00! Its being worked on by many people:


Don't forget to turn on the Captions:


Also Jean Louis Naudin has done some excellent replications:

Use Google Translate to read:


The Energy Out is Negative Energy. It is from Atomic Interactions of Paramagnetic Modulated Quanta. So you can see here, if I am right and this turns out to be the source of Floyd Sweets Energy Output, then it was never about the Magnets! "Rather, what happens is that the individual packets of quanta are polarized by the initiating and sustaining coherent force the field of the primary magnets or in special cases, electromagnets." Floyd has told us all along what he has done. He has just left out the part of how to. We have to figure this stuff out for our selves. Thanks to Michel Meyer, Richard VIALLE and Jean Louis Naudin we have now at least some information and experiments that can be done to start to understand how this New Form of Induction works.