Become a member of our Forum, and gain access to a lot more information!
Become a member of our Forum, and gain access to a lot more information!
|
SQM Replication Project Update 8-10-05.
It is not from the magnets as such or the original SQM would have had a configuration that was fairly conventional and a small output would be achieved (Say 6 watts like the original SQM). Simply information is not adding up on this project and some answers are needed. I think a few misleading truths have been told in the history of the SQM which is a shame. AND REALLY WHAT IS THE MOTIONAL E-FIELD???? It is obviously very important or it wouldn't be in the "Nothing is Something" Paper by Mr Sweet. This is an email I have sent to Mr Bearden in an attempt to further understand the SQM. I have had small Oscillations in the magnets but for short times and no output of any relevance is achievable, this was partly documented in the forth video update. Questions grow and the SQM project looks more difficult everyday. By now everyone must know how important the MOTIONAL E-FIELD is and that it cant be shielded and that it is so very important and the capacitors electro static field is dispersed evenly along a capacitor plate. Well if not read the paper "nothing is something" by Mr Sweet. I am sure it has been modified and that there are only parts in their that are important. How would one GENERATE a motional E-Field. What is needed and how can it be done with 10 V and 1/3 of a mill Amp. One could say frustration has set in.
Dear Mr Tom Bearden,
I have several questions for you. I have been working on the replication of the Sweet SQM for more than 12 months now. Several things don’t make sense on this project and Mr Sweet must have had the same problems. The Motional E-Field is Key to understanding this device and only this alone can explain the energy conversion in the SQM. Can you explain the Motional E-Field in extreme detail as this is a non conventional Field Effect that is very important to all devices weather it is conventional or not. The second thing is, does the energy collection come from the Eather or is it transformed from the Eather that surrounds us. If it is transformed, in what process could it be transformed to energy that we use. Mr Nikola Tesla transformed the Eather but he was not a mare peasant he was special and had a natural understanding of the problems he faced. Is the Motional E-Field shuttling energy into the collection coil at a determined frequency and the collection coils geometry is the transformation medium. Does the Excitation coils geometry and composite expose the driving force. I have been working on the magnets structure for more than 12 months now and they have no negative effects even if in oscillation which I have had for a small time. Absolutely no NEGATIVE effects have been observed with any oscillation on Barium Ferrite magnets. You said in your last letter the lattice structure had to be right but the lattice can only be in one motion at any one time. If Mr Sweet had changed the SQM in mid stream like you mentioned in your email and at that point he had successfully had conditioned his magnets, then where did the 6 Watts come from. What was the SQM's construction before the conditioning was achieved I have only achieved at any one time 1 Volt out of any device at any time and this is with the magnets oscillating which will dissipate in a short period. No energy collection Is gathered with all configurations tried. I have come to only one conclusion, this must be a non conventional construction that was privy to Mr Sweet and the coils MOTIONAL E-Field was extremely important in the understanding of this device. Only the MOTIONAL E-Field will make this device work and only in one way. Absolutely no Over Unity output is achievable unless the motional E-Field is understood and time is awasting. You can understand the importance of self-sustaining ourselves in the energy field. It does not even come into the fact of National security, Hurricane Katrina proved that with out a doubt. Millions of people DEAD in future disasters will not be a problem, even with terrorism on our door step, if this can be averted by self sustainable family’s that can pack and move with the comforts of home included by a short move to a near by community of safety from natural disasters. Money means nothing to anyone if people are dying to get it. Some can and some can’t achieve an understanding here and I do think it is possible to give the world the greatest gift of all right here. Imagine the Independence of people if they have energy at their finger tips. We are now mature enough to stand and accept responsibility for our future and terrorism can’t stop that fact.
Kind Regards Chris Sykes
Maybe information in this email will revel new information on the true SQM's nature and a replication will be more achievable and the time frame will be lowered as a result!!!!
|